Replying to Avatar Humble Bitcoiner

The MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulation, passed by the European Union, is one of the most comprehensive crypto frameworks globally. Its main goal is to create a standardized regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies and digital assets across all EU member states. Here’s a breakdown of its implications, especially concerning self-hosted wallets:

Key Points of MiCA:

1. Regulatory Clarity:

MiCA establishes clear rules for crypto asset issuers, exchanges, wallet providers, and stablecoin operators. This reduces regulatory uncertainty for businesses and investors.

2. Licensing for Service Providers:

Crypto exchanges, wallet providers (custodial), and other service operators must obtain licenses to operate in the EU.

3. Stablecoin Oversight:

Issuers of stablecoins must meet strict reserve, transparency, and operational requirements to ensure their stability and protect users.

4. Consumer Protection:

MiCA requires crypto firms to disclose risks, fees, and clear terms to protect consumers.

Impact on Self-Hosted Wallets:

Self-hosted wallets (like Ledger, Trezor, or software like MetaMask) are not directly targeted by MiCA. However, there are indirect implications:

1. Transfers to/from Custodial Wallets:

• MiCA includes provisions inspired by the “Travel Rule,” requiring exchanges and custodial wallet providers to verify sender and receiver details for transactions exceeding €1,000.

• If you transfer funds from a self-hosted wallet to an exchange, the exchange may require you to verify ownership of that wallet.

2. Increased KYC/AML Scrutiny:

• While self-hosted wallets themselves remain private, transactions involving regulated platforms may face enhanced Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks.

• This could reduce anonymity for users who frequently interact with custodial services.

3. Freedom to Self-Custody Remains Intact:

MiCA does not ban or limit the use of self-hosted wallets. You can still manage and store your funds independently without relying on custodians.

Implications for Crypto Users:

• For Self-Hosted Wallet Users:

• You retain full control over your crypto assets.

• However, interactions with custodial platforms may become more cumbersome due to compliance requirements.

If you have a Strike wallet and You receive funds worth => €1000 from some other user (using other kind of “self-hosted” wallet) into your Strike wallet, are you acquired to prove who the sender is?

Like acquire them of KYC? 👀

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Exactly my question that I’ve been asking to nostr:npub1cn4t4cd78nm900qc2hhqte5aa8c9njm6qkfzw95tszufwcwtcnsq7g3vle for a few weeks now

But still no answer how this will impact European Strike users

Europeans need you nostr:npub1cn4t4cd78nm900qc2hhqte5aa8c9njm6qkfzw95tszufwcwtcnsq7g3vle