Wanted to try zapworthy on the transcript but it didn’t read in the web console, does it work with extension #[2]​ ?

https://www.noagendashow.net/listen/1545/transcript

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

how to use zapworthy to nostrify ANYTHING valuable on the web

👇

https://nostr.build/av/nostr.build_02c8c47fefe7c28a3d9b96355fed7d3d881feae8a849af3f296276dc86907e11.mp4

nostr becomes an addressable store of all valuable data

and of shitposts, shitposts too 🤝

nostr:npub1xv8mzscll8vvy5rsdw7dcqtd2j268a6yupr6gzqh86f2ulhy9kkqmclk3x wrote this; super useful! 💜

https://gist.github.com/bumi/2d331871917228176a1d37691aabd244#file-zapworthy-bookmarklet-min-js

It’s very cool 🤙

We already have infrastructure for sending sats to podcasts. When you zap, you are leavin gout 9 other recipients who are included in the v4v split

Please consider what you are doing as counterproductive for Podcasts, unless you can adhere to the splits:

https://github.com/Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace/blob/main/value/value.md

Not sure I follow. How is this counterproductive?

When you use a tool that doesn't honor the value split, you leave the rest of the team out of the value stream. Here's a list of people Adam and John find valuable enough to include in their value splits that don't get a cut of the value. With the way podcasts handle value, even the show artist for the episode can get in on v4v.

https://void.cat/d/9CEU48WBjmWZYfbnPyxpp4.webp

I’m aware of how the splits work and participate in that ecosystem.

I don’t see how it’s counterproductive to use a monetisation tool on the transcript which doesn’t have any other monetisation options. That’s like saying “don’t quote a podcast” because the V4V splits don’t apply which is just silly.