Nostr Web Client

So take a modern day scenario. The IDF kick in the door of a Palestinian’s house and use their weapons to force the land owners out the house.

The land has been owned by the Palestinian family for many generations.

Now the Israeli government, defend it.

Whose land is it?

In libertarian world surely that breaks the non aggression principle, even if the Israeli government defend that land and rewrite law to benefit themselves?

Laeserin 1y ago

It doesn't actually matter what anyone thinks about it or what principle it breaks. Principles and rules you can't enforce are just blah blah.

The house is now possessed by Israel and they can just legalize that state and become full owners. That's how lots of people gained land as property, historically, after all, and squatters still do this in Europe. Just occupy a house for long enough that you gain a legal claim and can't be evicted.

Same thing with women and children and cows and silver candlesticks. Go on a raid. Drag beings and objects home. Beings and objects now yours. Winning. Congrats on your new property. 🤷‍♀️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

inpc 1y ago

That's my point... Then maintain 'libertarian non aggressive principles' because it's now their land and they don't want the same to happen to them.

The concept of property rights seems somewhat flawed.

Laeserin 1y ago

Yeah, humans tend to hypocrisy.

It's not merely a concept. It's simply humans describing what they see.

Vermeil_Kisser 1y ago

One principle that can be enforced is Total Kike Death, as in, you kill all who belong to one of those ethnicities+all who practice talmudic judaism.