My point is that we shouldn't just dismiss the state of DMs as you suggested in the first reply. Devs should implement NIP-17 as it stands today even though NIP-104 is in the horizon.

Considering that NIP-17 took about 1.2 years to be developed, audited, implemented by 2+ clients and merged, MLS will take another year to be ready.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It is worth noting that even with MLS coming out, NIP-17 may still be the preferred DM type because it supports device synchronization, whereas MLS does not.