To my knowledge, the only obligation grantees have to OpenSats is to report their progress so that there's some indication that they're actually progressing with what they stated they were going to do with the grant on their application

As a pleb who values privacy, albiet living in a place where the rules of law are reasonably well respected, I respect that some grantees are not living in such places, so being private about money received is probably a necessary security issue for some people

Given the relatively recent creation of grant foundations (HRF, Brink and OpenSats are the ones I'm aware of), I imagine that the backlog of applications for funding is gigantic, and consequently the competition extremely tough even for high-quality proposals

Have you ever applied for an OpenSats grant @semisol?