Friend: It's ok to be skeptical but one has to find some sources they believe share unbiased information. And if one has a source of many such sources they they can cross reference info and perhaps gain more confidence. For me, this Stanford study seems legit. It's science and frankly not super complicated science.

Perhaps you would trust the study if it came from UCI or Cal State Fullerton. Either way, the science doesn't change

Me: I think our institutions have been corrupted slowly over the decades and only escalted & accelerated in past 40years. From media, to large companies, to regulatory agencies, to healthcare, to government. Ucis, UCs and cal states were equal victims to this problem. I think the establishment of the central bank in the country famous for abolishing & rejecting it several times, America, in 1913, layed the foundation for downfall. 1933 executive order 6102 confiscated from honest actors. Everything in 1971 with creation of fiat, accelerated all after that. Fiat money corrupted others things

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Me (continues lol):With fiat money came fiat culture, fiat media, fiat foot, fiat healthcare, fiat science

I think all of this will start to reverse and there will be a period of pendulum swinging other way. As "fiat"isms will be replaced with verifiable integrity and truths but this will be slow and decades long. As fiat money itself dies

You are completely right, i need to find some sources of information, truths or whatever. The only thing ive heard of that i could be less skeptical of is some school in georgia called mises institute. Where they're all about Austrian school of economics. But ive only been exposed via talks & articles of those coming from there and its all around money, economics, history, philosophy. I have no idea if they do any sciences. If i find out somehow they do i guess i would follow that. But again youre right, need to find sources, publications or something where i can trust another witnesses' science (outside of my own experimentation on my own body)

Me (continued again lol): Same institutions with their "science" successfully lobbied in late 80s, early 90s banned stevia in the USA. And instead went for pepsico, kraft, coca colas alternate labratory made sweeteners. That apparently made certain other people sick. Well since lifting such ban sometime around 2004-2009, ive started using stevia, and oh my god, just like raw milk, found an alternate to the poison that is powdered sugar. Amazing.

But this was supposed to simple food science with our human bodies?

These are the same instutions that previously disbarred and ended careers of established medical doctors who agreed with or promoted patients who wanted to follow Keto diet in 2008-2011 timeframe. Same subject: science of food & our bodies

Many doctors caught in that small window of history have lost their entire livelihoods. But now being pro-keto is totally fine as a medical doctor lol