๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ฆ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐บ๐ฝ๐๐
Occasionally, a new block will be found and it will only have 1 transaction in it: the coinbase transaction (not to be confused with the exchange of the same name), which is currently 6.25 bitcoin.
Why does this happen? ๐๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ข๐ต๐ต๐ข๐ค๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ต๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฌ?
Letโs dive in and explore this thoroughly๐

At first glance, the presence of empty blocks in Bitcoin's timechain may seem perplexing, and even frustrating, considering the number of pending transactions lately. However, ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐, as they help ensure the network's security and continuity. They are ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต flaws in Bitcoinโs architecture, but ๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐จ๐ช๐ค ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด๐ฆ๐ด ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ข๐ณ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ค๐ฆ๐ด๐ด.
When a miner finds a block shortly after the previous one, they sometimes donโt have a prepared template of transactions yet. This presents them with a choice: secure the ๐ด๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ต ๐จ๐ถ๐ข๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ธ๐ข๐ณ๐ฅ of only the block subsidy while leaving the block empty, or take precious seconds to sort some transactions while risking the block being found by another miner before you can complete the process. ๐ ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป ๐ป๐ผ๐, ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ, ๐ฎ๐น๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ ๐๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ, ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฝ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ.
This preference is deeply rooted in the design of Bitcoinโs protocol. As soon as a new block is broadcast, miners race against each other to build on top of it with the next block. They begin with an empty block template to avoid losing precious time, and add transactions to it while they hash. If they find a valid hash before they can build a transaction template, ๐ช๐ตโ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ง๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ฏ๐ฐ-๐ฃ๐ณ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ to broadcast an empty block before another minder finds and broadcasts it.
Some compare empty blocks to a form of spam, bloat, or even an attack on the network. This is understandable, since a delayed confirmation of oneโs transactions can be annoying, but it ultimately misses the mark. True, empty blocks don't process any pending transactions, but ๐ป๐ฒ๐ถ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐น๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ. Instead, ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐จ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ค๐ถ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ท๐ช๐ฐ๐ถ๐ด ๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ค๐ฌ๐ด, and reaffirm the miners' commitment to maintaining the network's integrity.
Ultimately, empty blocks are a testament to Bitcoin's ingenious incentive structure. It's a system where every decision, ๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ฃ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ด๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ค๐ฌ, contributes to the network's overall strength and robustness. Empty blocks arenโt common, ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ, and they ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฏ'๐ต constitute spam; they're strategic decisions from miners that underline the resilience and foresight embedded in Bitcoin's architecture.

There has been a lot of questions and commentary about this lately, so be sure to ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ it with anyone who may not yet understand why some blocks are empty.
Give this a ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ค, and ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ it so you can reference it later.
Have further questions, or know something that I missed?
Let me know in the ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐โฌ๏ธ