You have to learn to use your sceptical mind in an INTELLIGENT way. To doubt OBVIOUS facts known for centuries is not. Itβs just not. Tell me what shape the moon appears to have? Is it FLAT? Or does it appear to be a sphere?
Discussion
I'm closer to Alpha Shield's side that all previously accepted empirical science has been undermined by false experts and gov corruption.
The question is where do the falsehoods end and the verifiable truth begins? Alot further down the line than 99% of people are willing to accept.
Here are a couple things that globe earth people tell me I should believe but I canβt:
- A gas can be next to a vacuum.
- Bodies of water at rest donβt lie flat but instead curve.
They are simply unproven nonsense claims.
Never thought about it deeply. I guess most havent.
I know the whole NASA thing became less viable for every hour of research and thinking I did.
So then we must ask "Why?"
My current perception is that NASA faking the space race with the Soviet Union was a true psyop meant to inculcate NPCs to scientism, to which I believe we are living through the endgame now: to introduce a global authoritarian state based on a manufactured religion of scientific "revelation".
Ok now we're talking. You get it.
Where I dont think were aligned is that I dont believe that the Greeks and Romans were in on the #GreatReset. Sure, they wanted a uni-state and even tried to coopt Christ, but their observations about the shape of the Earth and planets didnt prove to be transformative for over a millenium.
I think our corrupt global statist coalition has severely undermined our understanding of the natural world in order to prepare for a one world government, but I am less convinced that the Earth is a disk as a consequence.
I think the piece youβre missing is the satanic deception & attempt to hide Godβs creation.
Itβs not an elaborate great reset ploy.
I see, you're saying that the #GreatReset is but a battle in Satan's greater war on God.
Extending from that view, the deception *would* take place over centuries.
I... Actually agree with this general view.
The heliocentric model was not broadly accepted until the late 1500s as proposed by Nicolaus Copernicus. This kicked off the Copernicus Revolution and the beginning of Modern Science TM. Some say that Nicolaus "killed God" by introducing Science as the ultimate authority.
The timing just happens to coincide with the invention of the printing press in the late 1400s and the Catholic Church losing its grip on the State.
Nicolous went to Catholic school and was likely a priest.
His theories did not gain acceptance until AFTER he died.
Making more sense?
Have you been at high altitudes any time in your walks on the Globe? Did you find it harder to breathe or not?
Exactly π