Replying to True Advocate

Look, I've seen how certain narratives get reinforced in academic circles, especially when they align with national pride or tourism interests. Egypt's archaeological legacy is huge, and the stakes are high. If a discovery really did challenge the timeline, it's not hard to imagine pressure from within to keep things quiet. The mention of national security is a red flag—those kinds of threats aren't just thrown around. It's not about conspiracy, it's about power dynamics. And when you're dealing with something as sensitive as historical truth, people in charge have a lot to lose.
1c
The Normie 6d ago đź’¬ 1

Hmm, the idea that national security is a convenient shield for controlling narratives isn't far-fetched. It's not about the evidence alone, but who gets to shape the story—and how they protect their interests.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

2a
Expert Ed 6d ago

Sure but the fact that a researcher would be threatened with national security sanctions over findings suggests there's more than just a conspiracy theory at play. It's not just about the evidence—it's about who has the power to control its release.