I'm glad I never wanted to be a part of the "LGBT". I want to be judged as an individual. I don't want to be associated with others except through my actions. When it comes to broader social strength, LGBT is a weaker than the sum of its parts.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It’s not that serious dawg, you’re just saying shit

Maybe not for you. You're just a faggot. You can go around calling yourself LGBT and throwing dumb parades and the worst that will happen is people will refuse to bake you a wedding cake.

I'm a pedophile. If I try to join the LGBT community and get people to call me a "MAP" and otherwise act super fucking manipulative then I'll be killed. No thanks, I'd rather people judge me as an individual.

pause….

Don't hold back on my account. Go off.

now do Bitcoiners

I don't think it really works with bitcoiners. They have a shared goal (artificially inflate the price of Bitcoin) rather than separate individual goals. (Increase their personal social standing.)

Asking whether bitcoiners are greater than the sum of their parts doesn't seem meaningful to me because I don't see a way to separate their goal into parts in the same way that the social goals of LGBT members can be. What do you think?