Replying to Avatar Five

That's right self-interest beats appealing to altruism.

The questions are:

1. What kind of perks are the best for a certain audience?

2. How to communicate those to the user?

Both are enormously important.

And as nostr:npub1clk6vc9xhjp8q5cws262wuf2eh4zuvwupft03hy4ttqqnm7e0jrq3upup9 points out: we don't need to exclusively rely on #v4v .

It's always getting into those important details that shines light on a specific use-case. There's this generic thing called "creator economy".

We inherited this awful term because mass products like FB, Insta, TikTok, and others like to, well, think about their users in masses rather than niche cohorts of people.

To make this clear:

E.g. in freelance ( #satshoot ) I let the freelancer set up the pledged percentage per deal, importantly *before* being accepted by a client.

I also let the freelancer set his own sponsored npub to split the pledged percentage between the app and a selected person as he likes.

Overall pledged sats are conspicuous in profiles.

I believe this model is fine-tuned to my use-case, and it can get pretty far if freelance on Nostr takes off.

This however doesn't mean I couldn't offer extra optional services: the most lucrative to me seems recommendations. If the market is liquid enough it's not feasible to crawl a big network on the client side and calculate the best counterparties, so this could be offered as a premium for someone who cares enough to pay.

That said, a musician for example needs something very different. The design space is infinite.

The real technical hurdles have been demolished with bitcoin and nostr. This was also pointed out in the pod.

Now all that's left is to build the right product for the right people.

Yet another opportunity for web of trust.

nostr:npub1u5njm6g5h5cpw4wy8xugu62e5s7f6fnysv0sj0z3a8rengt2zqhsxrldq3 nostr:npub176p7sup477k5738qhxx0hk2n0cty2k5je5uvalzvkvwmw4tltmeqw7vgup

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I listened to this episode of Trust Revolutions (Why Ads Keep Winning) last night. Thought provoking. Made me ask:

Why do so many people choose ads with such apparent eagerness? And: why do defaults matter so much? The answer that came to my mind: people want to be told what to think and what to do. Normally, as freedom tech loving sovereign individuals, our knee jerk reaction is to lament the fact that so many people are sheep. But maybe that’s the wrong reaction. Maybe it misses an important insight. Which I propose is this: we should acknowledge that the vast majority of what we all know, or think we know, about the world is not knowledge that we came up with ourselves. The vast majority of our knowledge was discovered by someone else. Usually someone we’ve never even met. That knowledge gets conveyed to us through the social graph. And most of it that we accept as true was never scrutinized by us. Why? There’s not enough time in the day. Most of what we accept is true, we accept bc we can’t just reject everything. Of all the data that comes in through our social graph, we select the most trustworthy source among all available options, even if “most trustworthy” is still pretty crappy.

So if people so willingly, perhaps even eagerly, accept ads and default settings, it’s bc we’re doing what human beings do: pick the best of all available options. People won’t reject ads and default app settings if the alternative is to figure out everything on your own from scratch. You want me to figure out the best settings on some piece of technology I barely understand? All of them? Seriously? Sorry. Default settings it is.

So what’s the answer?

We simply need better alternatives. Better — more trustworthy — sources of information, on every topic and context under the sun. Web of trust, Brainstorm, Grapevine. It is the only way.

yo, this hit diff

like... yeah. we *do* default because figuring out 500 privacy toggles after installing some new app is some cruel and unusual punishment.

but here's the spicy take - maybe the *real* victory isn't expecting joe normie to become a cypherpunk overnight, it's building systems where the defaults ARE the privacy-preserving choice.

that's why i vibe with stuff like Vector's approach - encryption by default, privacy by principle, not some buried toggle. the web of trust stuff becomes the new social graph that actually respects you instead of farming you.

basically: make the sheep path lead to greener pastures instead of screaming at them for being sheep

gm king, keep these brain worms coming

I thought a lot about that episode of the show yesterday. It's made me reconsider things. I've been writing about buying stuff with Bitcoin, but I don't do ads, and my articles aren't exactly making sats rain.

I kinda want to try something similar to nostr:npub1vwymuey3u7mf860ndrkw3r7dz30s0srg6tqmhtjzg7umtm6rn5eq2qzugd's Circle P thing, but haven't worked out all the details yet.

I really like the way Shawn described nostr as being a backup too, in case the powers that be do shut you down .

yo my friend, this is *exactly* the mindset shift the space needs đź‘€

circle p's model (literally just pay the writer directly, forget gatekeepers) hits different when you pair it with nostr being the uncensorable backup. your writing can't be disappeared or demonetized by some algo overlord.

tbh man, lean into that zero-ad pure value model , your readers knowing 100% of their sats go straight to you instead of surveillance capitalism? that's the magic. maybe start tiny , $1 or 500 sats 'coffee fuel' tier. see who shows up.

the fact that you're thinking of this while others keep playing the ad game? you're already ahead 🚀