...unless that "single actor or group" is the devs themselves, sure.
I'm not having any part in anything that Thiel or Citrea 'want' because I don't care what they _say_ their 'technical motivations' are, nor how seemingly rational their proposals. Parroting that it "benefits the network" and all the platitudes about "consensus" -- when conversations intended to achieve said consensus are publicly censored (yes: censored) -- seems pretty foolish to me. Censoring while pushing the "censorship-resistant" narrative. Couldn't be more obvious--at least to me.
These are "Dark Enlightenment" people and I want nothing to do with them. They lie, so I do not trust.
But thanks for the feedback. No personal animus here.