Replying to Avatar karl Black

In five years Saylor and the loudest mouthpieces at Bitcoin Magazine will be leading the charge to increase block size. They’ll say it’s needed to accommodate all the great new things (spam) they’ve put on chain.

They’ll reduce the decentralization by making impractical for plebs to run a node.

They’ll claim it’s for the better for #bitcoin when what they really care about it ROI.
Avatar
CondorEnabler 1y ago

Saylor, as of 2 days ago, said that the small block size AND the low transfer rate are both features, not bugs, of Bitcoin. So he'd have to go directly against that.

I really don't know why people latch onto him as some sort of devil (or savior ftm).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
karl Black 1y ago

Speculation. I fully admit I may end up being wrong.

The man has a lot of influence. You can see that on X. I hope to see more voices giving ardent opinions counter to his apparent push for using the chain as a database for Microstrategy.