Yeah, the content rendered as-is acts as a fallback mechanism
Discussion
Pablo won me over with that argument in the format discussion, if every special kind has a sensible fallback "content" it helps usability a lot.
Well, a zap event, for example, has either empty content or a random comment as the content. That will make no sense for a client that doesn't understand zaps.
Do you think going forward new event definitions should reserve the content field for a fallback self-descriptive string?