Then you should take a look at https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/879
My implementation is different, since I believe a rating is generic (like a reaction) and can be applied generically.
I use m-tags to differentiate between different kinds of classes. Default is event, but you can rate whatever you want with a single event kind.
This linked NIP argues for different rating kinds for different classes.
I personally think it sucks for discoverability, but it may work.
There's no way I'm using different rating kinds for each object kind. That's the same mess we had with a different reply kind for each kind.
Ratings are like comments, highlights, citations, reactions, zaps. They're a thing unto themselves, not an attribute of some other thing.
No replies yet.
