Subnostr

There was a time when protestants and catholics killed each other.

There was a time when english and french killed each other.

There was a time when french and germans killed each other.

There was a time when bosnian, serbs and croats killed each other.

Now they don't.

Peace is possible. Peaceful resolution of even the most intractable conflicts is possible. No matter how complex the territorial, religious, ethnic, cultural differences... there is a way to live together in peace. It has been done before. Let's not just learn from the mistakes of the past, but also from the success of the past.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Flix 2y ago

All it takes is the rational understanding that blood is a big expense. No matter how imperfect the peaceful agreement, it is almost always better than the outcomes achieved by violence, even if you are on the winning side.

Kiko Tsuki 2y ago

Me alegro de leer esta Nota, porque desde ese pensamiento de Paz, está pensado #Deius

Entiendo que a priori los bitcoiners (tecnólogos y científicos) de Resolución de Conflictos entiendan poco, por eso es esencial escuchar a los Juristas que si entendemos Bitcoin (a base de estudiar e investigar cada madriguera).

Nosotros entendemos la parte de Teoría de Juegos del Protocolo, somos especialistas el #ODRS y entendemos el mundo de la Conflictología, y todo esto nos ha llevado a entender que se podían creer Protocolos de Consenso sobre Capa-2 de Bitcoin y crear un modelo autocompositivo [frente al heterocompositivo tradicional] de Justicia Descentralizada que devuelve el poder de decidir sobre sus Conflictos al Ciudadano. Es decir, empoderamos a los Ciudadanos frente al Monopolio que mantienen los Estados sobre la Justicia ⚖️. Eso es lo que estamos planteando en el proyecto #DEIUS.

✔️Tenemos un Oro Digital inconfiscable

✔️ Ahora tenemos este espacio de Libertad comunicativa libre de censura

✔️ Podemos tener un modelo propio de Justicia Descentralizada basado en la PAZ: Consenso

🍀🙋🏻‍♂️🫶

freeborn | ἐλεύθερος | 8r0gwg 2y ago

This is what American "exceptionalism" is supposed to refer to: a denominationlly-neutral State removes the sword from any single religious sect's hands. After the English civil wars, this "experiment in the wilderness" of religious disestablishment was the "exception" to the then-current rule. "No religious tests" was not intended to remove all religion from public life, but to disarm any particular religion's authority, and to separate it from State authority. We should speak about the "separation of church *authority* from state *authority*" not the "separation of church and state."