Yes, the end user doesn’t care how the money is split.

But that detail could be made available as an expansion tab for transparency

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Relays & Clients then compete for business - perhaps?

Think how Lightning nodes compete for fees by offering cheap routing fees.

Competitors keeps fees low, but the best node operators can make a decent living from routing payments

Yes, I think I can see the correlation. Almost like a bidding pool. Users would set their split, and that would determine the budget for relays, etc.

Users could also favorite certain relays they wanted to always carry their messages.

Yes, new relays could enter the market by offering low fees to start with and then increase them as they build their reputation.

I love this idea.

You could also have an amboss style monitoring system for relays, giving stats for things like uptime, connectivity, fees etc which feeds into the suggestion algorithm.

It would need to be carefully designed to avoid it being gamed, but uptime is a critical metric. It’s one I’ve focused on myself, after having so many go offline in my client.

Agreed