Here’s another framing. Anything can monetize given the right conditions. Ramen and cigarettes become money in prison, for example.

So in our current fiat currency debt as money system s we here there has been rampant debasement of the currency since 1971, the people try to store their wealth in something other than the melting currency.

Thus Stocks, Fine Art, College Education, and Real estate have monetized and inflated beyond their actual utility.

Hard money will strip all of them of this unnatural monetization. Because if your money can’t be diluted, confiscated, or sanctioned, hell, just save in that!Makes sense?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, the argument for Bitcoin as hard money makes sense. My point is just that there will still be a need for intermediaries, since a) not everybody will want to take on the burden of self-custody, and b) the need for credit will continue to exist as long as people want to build new things. Make sense?

Yes, it makes sense. I just think it will play out differently.

Self custody will become simple, safe, and commonplace. AI agents could help us here.

On a gold standard, two brothers who owned a bicycle shop were able to save enough hard money to take time off and invent the airplane. No loans, no credit needed. Just a dream and savings in hard money. Imagine that x 1,000.

Well said.

In some cases, people may be able to self-fund ventures like that, sure. Happens with fiat and other non-hard money assets, too. But if you don’t have enough Bitcoin or don’t want to part with it outright, you’ll need credit in some shape or form.

Perhaps. Hopefully, we’ll both be around to find out!

Yes sir! Agreed on that one 🤙