Haha, bunch of ungrateful b'stards. They should cherish you!

You are very important to the existence of the protocol.

The problem with not knowing who to turn to is a classic. Every team will first point to the other, because it saves them the trouble. Only when you can prove without a doubt that their system is causing the issue, will they submit and try to do something about it.

An ungrateful role to say the least. And you shouldn't be doing it without some kind of compensation. Either financial or in (high) recognition!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Often, they mute me or tell me "user error". 😂

Yeah, I need to stop doing this and focus more on my own project. I'll just go batty, otherwise. Screaming into the void, all day.

Sad, very sad that you are treated in this way. In stead of cherished and thanked for every issue you raise.

Stupid and short-sighted of them. They will get it back eventually, either by complaints of users or worse, users rejecting their garbage software. Either way will be painful.

You should definitely not use your precious time if they are treating you like that. Move on and spend your time on the tings you like.

I guess it's just me being my nerdy self, churning out a product nobody wants, for weeks, without taking a hint. 😂

Took me a while to get that nobody actually cares if their stuff works well or interoperates. I thought they didn't have the information, but they don't have the motivation.

There is simply no Nostr incentive structure for "Things Working".

nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m

Do you know if there is any incentive for hard working people like this girl who sacrifices her time and effort without any financial incentive or recognition?

Software testing is an ungrateful work and there is no focus on quality and interoperability. How can we solve this?

Please read previous posts in this thread for more info and let us know what you think.