For sure, I thought about requiring a small sats fee in order to publish. Or, some sort of WoT. But, for now the ratioed option seemed like the best to start and gauge from there.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A fee comes with the problem that content can now be censored by refusing to sign an event saying they paid the fee.

Why do you need to sign an event saying paid?

You cannot enforce the fee otherwise

how about lnurl-withdraw or cashu sent with the video?

Cashu may as well be a signed event, like zaps.

LNURLW is not proof (it is an offer to pay, not proof of payment)

Isnt a directly taken "offer to pay" a proof? What do I dont see in the context?

Or you mean you need the proof for "accounting" purposes?

You need proof so clients can validate β€œyes this person paid the fee to publish”

An LNURLW can still be revoked

Valid point.

And you mean having payment for spam is making it censorable, and you want a provably uncesorable sw. Right?