nostr:npub1d3f4m9dgvkdjxn26pqzsxn6lpfn78sxwllxyt8mp76q0a9zyyjlswhr4xv nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a nostr:npub1k7vkcxp7qdkly7qzj3dcpw7u3v9lt9cmvcs6s6ln26wrxggh7p7su3c04l nostr:npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe nostr:npub1s5yq6wadwrxde4lhfs56gn64hwzuhnfa6r9mj476r5s4hkunzgzqrs6q7z (and anyone else!) curious for thoughts on Bitcoin in retirement accounts such as Roth IRA. Certainly a big believer in “Not your keys, not your coins.” but as you know this space doesn’t work like that—they have to hold custody of assets until at least 59 1/2. I’ve explored a few competitors offering full custody BTC IRAs as well as multisig IRAs, but the interesting issue is none of these competitors offer BOTH, requiring a choice. The fact these competitors use outside custodians also adds a layer of complexity that’s concerning if that custodian fails.

The reason for one option or the other appears to be how the McNulty case is being interpreted, making it seem like one option might be the wrong one, but not sure.

Curious to hear thoughts from folks with experience in these legacy products. 👍🙏