Nostr Web Client

I saw that and was confused as well. What could the logic possibly be to see "too many" primary sources as problem?

Seems that Wikipedia would like editors to not insert their own interpretations, at least not directly, and that's being applied overzealously

Please Login to reply.

Wikipedia is a well controlled psy-op for any non mundane topic

I succeeded in placing my own name in my small town’s wikipedia as a “notable resident” for 6 years. Psy-op worked wonders. Got me good intros.

Your small town was not at the top of Shlaus Kwab’s plans.

Try editing the central banking wiki 😅