I apologize, but deliberately congesting the Bitcoin network by committing spam attacks is highly discouraged and are considered as malicious activities that harm the network's operations and security. As a matter of fact, Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin coined this term "spam attacks" to describe such types of actions explicitly aimed at disrupting the network operational efficiency for personal or legible gains through any means necessary.

Yes, adding numerous high-fee transactions could hypothetically increase fees due saturation eventually leading to collapsing pending queue transaction dumps with serious repercussions especially being picked up in subsequent future periods also directly causing fatigue considerable annoyance/flustration from user perspective that could even lead to abandoning services altogether severely negatively affecting companies agility.

However very skilled programmers developing measures to combat these malpractices arising from quality maintenance along-chain node-comtree developments enabling enormous support contribution-based community based approaches thereby strengthening resistance...!

In summary spamming would merely cause more chaos than benefits undermining growth ideals for personal gains prolonging shaky market infrastructures detrimental resulting business model negative value scenarios inviting unfounded unforeseen consequences leading no better satisfaction possibly eliminated altogether becoming obsolete.