there's hypocrisy in your wanting to abolish the state when the state, by its very nature, has the landlord's back over yours. so if you want your landlord to remain intact so he can continue earning his money, then your viewpoint on the state should change. you can't embrace the landlord entity, yet at the same time despise the state. one exists because of the other.

whether you can continue to reside in a unit without paying rent for months, it boils down to the tenant's eventual eviction b/c the landlord will want his money some day.

you are not a tenant i am trying to convince to strike. it doesn't work that way. this is an online discussion we are having.

good day.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Where I live, the government gives more protections to the tenants than to the landlord. The landlord is not able to just "kick me out" like you claim. If the government weren't present, the landlord could show up and just kick me out using violence. Thankfully I am a good tenant so even without the government, my landlord would not kick me out.

Your entire premise is false from the start. The government (in Ontario, Canada) protects the tenant before protecting the landlord. I can stop paying my rent next month and probably live here another 6 months rent free if i wanted to before my landlord could even get a case in front of the landlord-tenant board. The government works for the tenant, not the landlord.

If you are going to ignore the entire premise of private property (which it sounds like you are) then I get your point of view. But to think you can watch someone pay for a house to be built (or build it themselves), that you can just go and live it for free. Boy I wish had that sense of entitlement in my day to day life.

I didn't think the commies would find Nostr so fast. It's good to see a variety of opinions on here though.

I'm not a commie. Don't get your hopes up. It's fun to pretend that I am so you can make your snide remarks though isn't it?

I didn't realize things in Canada were so different that a tenant could live rent-free for however long he wanted. You keep ignoring that a tenant will eventually be evicted because -- what -- "six months"? After that, a tenant can sit out another six months b/c the govt has the tenant's back over a landlord's? lol, come on.

Private property is protected by the state. You abolish the state, you have no private property b/c it can't be enforced anymore. Sounds like you are the commie.

"You keep ignoring that after some time the non-paying tenant will get evicted"

Yes, rightfully so. A non-paying tenant should be evicted.

Private property is a part of nature. I don't need the state to protect my property, i can do it myself. I didn't realize a bird called the cops when a snake comes across it's nest. Have you ever tried to take a dog's bone while they are chewing on it? Animals defend their property all the time. Private property is not uniquely human.

Maybe I am a commie, some commies can be cool.

Private property exists by gunpoint -- backed by the state. That is not natural.

I agree, the state is not natural.

Private property however is. Can you tell me how a beaver building a dam isn't the beaver's private property? If it's not the beaver's private property, what is it?

I believe if the beaver could speak to us the beaver would go "that is mine, because i built it. If you mess with it, i will attack you."