Replying to Avatar Ted Mielczarek

nostr:npub1fgrrkcptz5hwg7s0na9at92h5rk64q2lcmsafue76l8vla2uttsq3auxh0 nostr:npub1psdfxfpxz2cwmmnsk60y3nqpn2tqh9n24h4hstvfkwvr6eaek9js499sr7 having played around with the ChromeOS build system in the past, it's very much tied to specific models, not just CPU+architecture. This is likely them not wanting to continue updating/building/testing against all those models. (But the end result sucks )

nostr:npub13clde8qu93d7z3negghkz3wq0a7uq5ulxmc3sm4rkslrtua2vezqdcxlw8 nostr:npub1fgrrkcptz5hwg7s0na9at92h5rk64q2lcmsafue76l8vla2uttsq3auxh0 Well then, that's Google's fault for bad product architecture! It should still be penalized when it's sold for a profit. (ChromeOS is based on a Linux kernel and can have a full Linux userland installed, so there's ZERO excuse for this inflexibility.)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.