Not that i dont want to. I just haven't had the time to do a good job at it.
Discussion
This event contains 4 plain e-tags which by the old positional rules would be root-e-tag, reply-e-tag, other e-tags.
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/10.md?plain=1#L34
In plebstr, we do not add any markers. We are currently working on rebuilding new post, which will add them, but it's not out yet. The current released version we keep e-tags and add new one at the end without markers, it’s not the best but as im saying we are currently working on changing that 😊
By copying the marked e-tags with the "reply" mark, replies look like replies to the parent of the actually replied-to event.
That’s true, thanks for pointing this out and we will fix that in a new version of writing post. We previously followed the currently deprecated scheme without thinking about any markers, mistakes were made and im sorry
Great! I suspect others do the same but it would be hours of work to find out and match to clients. These out-of-order threads bugged me since long and I doubt it's only plebstr unless plebstr has a vastly bigger user base than I had assumed.