Ok, allow me to spell it out for you:
The fact a majority or even one other person gets to decide soft or hard forks everyone else must follow to participate in the network is a weakness. Like democracy or a theocracy, bitcoin is vulnerable to the same things they are.
A better alternative is individual choice. Hopefully a bVM enables this as would Drivechain.
I used some big words here, so a simpler version is: i do not like taproot and several other bips, but must go along with them against my will.
Two i do like , drivechain, is not accepted by the majority of tweeters or a minority of core devs, the priesthood.
The fact they get to decide this means bitcoin is not freedom money.
It could be with tech like BitVM or Drivechains which allows addition of features permissionlessly, which means further bips on main will not be needed, and even past one might be removed for the sake of ossification.
Maxi's are in general toxic to bips.
