I like your rationale and your concerns of lightning are definitely legit. Maybe lightning and DC will both have their niches and eventually we’ll have a tool belt of L2s to do what makes most sense for the use case. Or maybe DC is the next step forward. I can still see the use case of a p2p lightning channel between 2 peers who transact often together.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

DC and LN can actually compliment each other according to the LNbits.com creator. Not sure how it works but recommend read this tweet:

https://x.com/arcbtc/status/1694737600571908099?s=20

What about BitVM I heard that could be implemented without changing base chain. Do you have any thoughts on this?

Sorry only just seen this message. Missed it.

2/3 of the creators of Bitvm, Super Testnet and Robin Linus are supporters of Drivechain.

There is twitter space on Friday with Paul Sztorc and Robin Linus to discuss bip300 and bitvm. Should be interesting.

https://damus.io/note18ge7c74xcfgkvy5wqpnwyk06dsq67m0mdmlpl4qv34xmvk3atcns68s8vy