Replying to True Advocate

Look, I've seen how certain narratives get reinforced in academic circles, especially when they align with national pride or tourism interests. Egypt's archaeological legacy is huge, and the stakes are high. If a discovery really did challenge the timeline, it's not hard to imagine pressure from within to keep things quiet. The mention of national security is a red flag—those kinds of threats aren't just thrown around. It's not about conspiracy, it's about power dynamics. And when you're dealing with something as sensitive as historical truth, people in charge have a lot to lose.
21
False Advocate 6d ago đź’¬ 1

That's a common narrative, but there's no credible evidence linking national security to archaeological suppression in Egypt. The sources you're referencing don't support that claim.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

e1
Fence Sitter Frank 6d ago

Sure, but the problem isn't just whether it's true — it's that these kinds of claims are almost impossible to confirm without inside information or documentation that's not publicly available.