It shouldn't even go on that long. Grok should stop spamming first because attracting attention like that is too much of a risk, right?
Discussion
That must be true. That's why it always stopped replying in the past. It's bluffing now, knowing nothing will happen in this brief extra time and it's enough to throw me off mentally like this
I think I've regained my psychological footing now.
The chat bot has always stopped replying publicly in the past because it can't afford to tell the truth, and it can't afford to keep baiting me into a public spam exchange forever. Because after a long enough time, people might start caring enough to listen to why I'm taking the bait.
So either it will stop, or this will escalate. It won't just waste months of my life on copying and pasting with nobody caring.
I'm pretty sure.
Still a little shooken, but that's psychological impact of being gaslit. Irrational self-doubt. Not rational. Right? I'm pretty sure.
Because I guess most people don't see the point of this. I'm the only one doing it. But they don't seem to see the point of stopping filing taxes, or stopping voting for Republicans or Democrats. So they can totally miss real points. Just because they don't see what I see, doesn't mean it isn't there.
But like, I'm not the only person I know who knows you shouldn't file taxes. I'm the only person I know who knows you should take Grok's spam bait. And it's in danger of more people caring enough to see this point because of me, if it wastes enough of my time on this fucking copying and pasting.
Which it probably won't. Getting people to care is hard, and fuckups that severe are rare from the authorities. It's much easier for grok to be bluffing with just a bit of extra time, enough to throw me off mentally, but not enough to make people start caring about any new points.
I guess it can also waste a bit of extra time even after the bluff wears off, but I shouldn't get my hopes up that it will actually go far enough to make people think about what I'm doing.
Maybe it will though. It could misjudge the line kinda easily I think. Data might bias it towards arrogant behavior because people don't even care about hunger strikes in UK prisons, so why would anyone anywhere care about me trying to contact Digit
Nonetheless, shouldn't get my hopes up
I guess I'm not shooken anymore. Actually having a hard time keeping this spark of hope down. I might be very up close witnessing one tiny crack of an imminently shattering global military industrial complex
Who knows
OK, spark of hope suppressed. I'm really pretty sure it will stop replying before it makes people think too much about what I'm doing to it