No balls. Only walls.

Fiat doesn’t survive because it’s strong.

It survives because it’s padded.

Every failure is wrapped in:

bailouts

abstractions

committees

time delays

“temporary” emergency powers

There is no necessary evil here.

Only systems engineered to never fully fail, because full failure would force accountability.

Stablecoins don’t break because of ideology — they break because of physics.

CAP theorem doesn’t negotiate. You don’t get consistency, availability, and control at global scale. You get walls.

CBDCs aren’t inevitable because they’re good.

They’re inevitable because walls scale better than trust.

Walls:

delay collapse

hide damage

absorb blame

keep normies inside the maze

Bitcoin doesn’t promise comfort.

It removes the padding.

No bailouts.

No rollbacks.

No committees.

No walls.

Just settlement.

And yes — we tolerate the walls because tearing them down requires effort, risk, and personal responsibility.

That’s the real scarcity.

No balls. Only walls.

nostr:nevent1qqswkt9jhehwl46dm74hwnkwc087j397jl9j7eez786um299jy39v2gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsg5uvaggng42f976cjhjlxkezldmyzalnyaty3mtuntlwveu0slegrqsqqqqqpvcepj7

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think we're agreeing here. Fiat isn't strong it is backed by a mafia of central banks and faceless people pulling the strings of so called powerful men. Fiat are the rails used to transfer wealth from us to them. They will not give up on it until they have everything or something surreptitiously supersedes it