It’s so over nostr:note1wmush7u0a6zq0r6lzk0rw92favutms5m05zj9m062txwdxdgat8sdf64zp
Discussion
Only a technological rebirth with existential implications can save the species.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic... or miracles. People who performed (little understood at the time, even today) miracles managed to transform the world many centuries ago in ways that could not be imagined.
Something similar we can do today with technological advances that will be considered "miracles" by many. Yes, we can change the world for the better, we can make fundamental positive changes.
Use the power of your imagination to understand what implications would have being able to control Gravity at will. All the implications.
Thank you.
Let's take a vow to withhold retirement support of the species suiciders called environmentalists when the collapse comes. Heck, they're still likely to somehow put the blame on "straight white men" and users of carbon-based fuels for their self-induced poverty.
Depopulation and declining birth rates in the west is such multifaceted social-economic problem.
But I think my generation are probably going to create chaos from not having children or leaving it later in life.
-hookup culture
-Covid lockdowns
-devaluation of the fiat currencies meaning people delay marriage and having less children
-the rise of feminism and equality in the work place
-women look for men who make more money than them but women are now outperforming men in the workforce and college education
-health reasons: men’s sperm count is on the decline due to unknown environmental factors
-there’s a strong economic incentive to divorce now.
Probably many more.
I hope there is a renaissance of marriage and having kids for good of society but young people in the west are struggling
Blaming our generation or something specific doesn’t fix the societal problem. It’s requires a complete change in attitude on seriously going about positive vision for the future.
Sorry for my rant.
Incitation économique liée aux divorces sociologiquement non. Juste un changement mentalité responsable pour l'enfantement qui est un risque et une responsabilité sur plus 26 à 30 ans pour un être qui n'a pas demandé à naître de plus s'il naît avec avec un handicap ou pas déviant ou pas c'est un facteur à prendre. Le mariage ou autre couple sont juste un pacte plein d'incertitude. Rappelez vous on ne marie pas par amour (sociologie)
La note mérite des échanges entre pairs et toute génération confondue
Merci... Des sujets sur lesquels nous pourrions échanger sur des espaces... Qu'en pensez+vous, ma vie tourne sur nos sociétés social travail handicap. Préventions et accompagnement de tout public en situations de risques de vulnérabilités sociales...