In my opinion, buying shares in MicroStrategy is one of the most effective and efficient ways to get to hyperbitcoinization. If people want hyperbitcoinization to happen faster, they need to buy as many shares of $MSTR as they can and HODL them forever šŸ˜‚

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I understand the premise, but still prefer to hold BTC directly

It’s an optional speculative attack, but it’s better if more people are participating in it

Is that you Saylor ? šŸ˜‚

Helping Saylor stack sats does not get the world to hyperbitcoinization.

He’s buying sats FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS

He is certainly stacking sats alright. Bullish days ahead.

If you own 1% of the stock, he’s buying you nearly 100 BTC per year

Yes, if you own MSTR you’re beating the underlying asset in a bull market and thus the ETF. With more risk to be sure, but regardless, good times so far.

But again, helping Saylor stack more sats does not lead to hyperbitcoinization.

Yes it does, because the sats belong to the shareholders, and it supercharges the speculative attack

And if you prefer self-custody Bitcoin, then holding MSTR will give you 5x-10x more purchasing power to buy more #Bitcoin with the profits

Yes, prefer self custody. Yes, one could potentially pull that trade off, or say in a tax sheltered account, arbitrage between bull/bear cycles between MSTR and the ETF.

The shareholders own equity in the company, which are not redeemable for sats.

If Saylor decided tomorrow to sell all of MSTR’s sats, the shareholders could leave, they could file a worthless lawsuit, but they couldn’t take ā€œtheirā€ sats.