You assumed from my response that I lack knowledge! 🤔

Isn't that interesting?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is good dialogue. We're seeking rhythm entrainment to get on the same frequency.

Stacking Functions is most likely right and wrong to assume you lack knowledge as that is the state for everyone. Of course it varies from person to person and subject to subject but universally we all lack knowledge. The question is what knowledge do we lack and is it applicable.

In this case, it was perhaps peak irony to tell me that the Matrix has me.

If you were to familiarize yourself with my research and the types of people interested in it, you would probably realize the irony of that Matrix statement.

Stacking Functions is a mutual and a fan of my content, whereas you and I just crossed paths for the first time yesterday (as far as I can tell) so, presumably, you're not up to speed on my research or my history or how it directly pertains to The Matrix.

I saw on your site that you're interested in world changing tech. My research builds upon the work of the guy who was the target of the American Airlines Flight 191 "accident" back in '79.

You probably will want to check out my research. Links in my bio. Optimal order is PD5 short, PD5 my chapter of the full episode, PD6 short, PD6 my chapter of the full episode, and then close all that out with Once Bitten 562 (fountain link).

So you've read it? Apologies for assuming

That's still not what I mean.

You assume I know less than the author 😂

Have you ever shared your counterpoints to Lowery's points?

Any articles, longform posts, podcast rants, etc. on the subject?

You didn't believe my first comment.

The Matrix has you.

Your echoing the narrative you've been offered, while others are creating their own game.

There are multiple games afoot, don't play them, create your own.

I'm your Huckleberry. Check out my research.