I've known about it altering DNA before, but that means nothing when all food items do. When a life experience alters our DNA, it means nothing to say a needle does.
Seeing as I have seen nothing negative about it, I want to know if there is any evidence the worry isn't just overblown.
I have yet to see it.
so, if i understand it correctly, to you it means nothing that one thing may alter your dna if other things already alter your dna anyways?
and next to that you have yet to see evidence of it but you also have known about it altering your dna?
and do you comprehend what it means that they initially falsely claimed that it does not alter dna, and then later publish that it does in fact alter it, as you see portayed in the top meme? isnt that worrying to you? have you checked those studies? maybe there's something in it.. otherwise maybe research nakadais findings here: https://nakadai.substack.com/
Yea, they also claimed it was safe while people dropped dead of myocarditis. I held off from taking the vaccines as long as I could financially afford it for a reason. It caused me and my brother heart palpitations and we refused everything after this.
Im just curious about the DNA alterations and whether its right for people to worry or not. We arent really sure what to be scared about beyond a vague "DNA change".
Ill take a look at the link. Thanks!
The concept of altering DNA isn't worrying, correct. Its WHAT is being edited and HOW that needs to be investigated.
You misunderstand. I havent seen evidence of negative effects from the alteration. I am also curious on how epigentics responds to those changes.
ah i see now
okay, hope you find some useful stuff about it!
here's the npub of the writer of the substack i referenced in case you want contact nostr:npub1sqaxzwvh5fhgw9q3d7v658ucapvfeds3dcd2587fcwyesn7dnwuqt2r45v
Followed!
