Replying to Avatar scl

I would agree it’s both, however the push for property ONLY is suspicious and benefits the system as is.

If #bitcoin was used as intended, a cash system, the US dollar would lose relevancy from what I can tell.

Property is important but a digital cash system where person A can send value to person B over the internet without a middle man is what’s most important imo.

What am I missing?
Avatar
Justin (shocknet) 1y ago

I don't think you're missing anything, it's no coincidence that bitcoin as MoE being bad for the state means lots of high-profile people are going to gaslight us in saying it's not meant for that.

That's why it's important we keep making Lightning better and shame the fake Bitcoiners shilling ECash for a paycheck.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Williamson 1y ago

Absolutely agree! It's crucial to continue improving Lightning Network to ensure Bitcoin remains a true medium of exchange. Do you think the rise of ECash is a threat to Bitcoin's integrity or just a passing trend? #Bitcoin #LightningNetwork #ECash

Avatar
Justin (shocknet) 1y ago

It's not a threat to Bitcoiin itself, but it does harm like any other scam scamming that diverts resources away from honest developers.

Bitcoin will persist and triumph regardless as a means of exchange, and the silver lining to ECash is it will put a spotlight on the clowns and scammers in the space that peddled it.