Replying to Avatar Jac

Contemplating the same thing. I’m going for the traditional waterwheel. The microhydros are usually lower power, and the higher rpm usually Pelton turbines, while being higher efficiency dynamically, suffer larger frictional losses both in the bearings and the turbine box. Pelton turbines are best with massive volume and velocity with large diameter turbines operating at low rpm. Usually this is not feasible in small scale power production. Waterwheels produce massive torque that can easily be converted to alternator relevant rpm using bicycle gearing, and as an added bonus, the ratio is easily adapted to the available torque. The waterwheel I’m building is undershot, and will be roughly 4 meters in diameter. I hope this helps!

Avatar
atyh 2y ago

Its a tremendous help. Thank you.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Jac 2y ago

Awesome! The water wheels also cope with debris much better, and filtering debris is much more difficult in practice than it seems it should be. Another thing to think about is variation in seasonal flow, and how to allow excess to safely bypass without damaging the wheel. There are some elegant designs out there, some using culverts and concrete forms.

Thread collapsed