agree with you, I also used it but remember when multiple vulnerabilities were found in the protocol and in the crypto libraries, so a great refactoring was happening... Then it didnt gain momentum and feeled like it werent enough people working and interested in it.

Today, with the better instruments and knowledge we have, I'll try something more scalable and that fullfills completely all the needs for perfect secure and private communication.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

and yet the great thing is that the devs have been open and transparrent and fixed whatever they can

on the other hand perfectly secure system is never the case but we all as a society profit from good alternatives and not the bad ones that can be eavesdropped, manipulated, ban accounts, censored etc. ....

similar with Gnu/Linux, *BSD ...

agree with you, and also agree that the team and the people around the project had demonstrate to be really competent and purely driven by the goal of develop a good messaging protocol, without corporate bullshit.

Have a great day bro ✌️

you too 😁🙏