i hate to break it to you but you probably have asian and african and maybe even american indian genetics way back.

you know, humans have been around for in total a million years in some form, and our type, the "sapiens" variety have been around some 200-300 thousand years.

the amount of history that we know about is a pittance compared to these numbers. literally, aside from like 3 or 4 skeletons found between the ages of 40,000 and 1 million years we have ZERO idea. genetics? yeah, we do have some idea, a lot of ideas, and the simple fact that 70% of humans have the mutation for white skin and/or lactose tolerance is a good example.

this means that all those dirty brown people you hate, have white relatives way back somewhere too, or they wouldn't be able to drink milk. i know for sure i have austro-indonesian ancestors no more than 4 generations back, so i have some of the visible signs but if your dirty brown ancestors were 10 generations back, the only way you could find out is by getting your DNA checked.

so anything you want to say about race, as in "genetic heritage" is bullshit, because you literally don't know.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

the whole thing about there being no migration or travel between the americas and eurasia is nonsense also. firstly, it's possible to sail across the pacific and the atlantic in primitive boats. but why would you even do that if you can just hop across the Bering Strait?

secondly, in the 1 million years according to the ice cores and other evidence of glaciation, that, and probably between canada and northwest europe was probably solid ice to walk across as well, covered in seals and polar bears.

it probably got so frozen up even that there was a connection between argentina and southern australia.

so there's basically no way that you are not related to all of the other humans on the planet and your so-called race is a myopic, short term of separation, and you are cherrypicking a tiny part of the data to support your absurd sense of superiority.

as for what you talk about how shitty those other people are? yeah, i'm not gonna argue with that. but there's a much larger arc of the story there. most of it isn't even hardly fully understood even, because so much of history has been perverted and distorted. and yeah, while we are talking about it, a lot of the people who did all that perverting were literally white people.

most likely, this is because of the fact that there used to be more kinds of humans than there is now, and the "white race" actually traces back to north africa about 40,000 years ago. they were taller, they discovered how to herd cattle because they acquired a mutation to be able to drink milk after childhood, and developed much larger (like 7-9 feet tall) physiques than we have now. among those, there were some who spread out across the planet and dominated the smaller, more primitive humans, and that's how it came to be that 70% of humanity can drink milk now.

anyway, it's just ignorant to say that anyone is only the product of things that came before them. people actually do things in their lifetimes that make a much bigger difference than what they were taught and who their parents were.

This is literally the two of you idiots for the ENTIRETY of this "conversation":

go fuck yourselves in your fucking temporary faces.

you two clearly need help... my last offering - if you are truly curious.

in a spirit of peace believe it or not - see ya 👋:

"The complete history of the white race, spanning 350 centuries of tumultuous events. This is a story–of vast visions, empires, achievements, triumphs, reckless blunders, crushing defeats, and stupendous struggles.

Most importantly, revealed in this work is the one true cause of the rise and fall of the world’s greatest empires – that all civilizations rise and fall according to their racial homogeneity and nothing else–a nation can survive wars, defeats, natural catastrophes, but not racial dissolution.

The Prometheus Edition of March of the Titans has been completely rewritten, expanded, and updated. It is printed in full color throughout."

https://ostarapublications.com/product/march-of-the-titans-volume-i-the-rise-of-europe/

oh look i found your progenitor.

i hate to break it to you smart guy, but your anthropology and genetics knowledge is right up there with your your own of the same - from the, of course ANTI-WHITE, stone age:

(whats it like being wrong about everything and serving the agenda of evil itself? are you even actually alive enough to notice or care??)

"Much to the chagrin of scholars seeking an African origin to fully modern human behavior, there is simply too much evidence to the contrary. It was fine to say that the seeds of human greatness arose in Africa and that these chosen people then spread out and replaced all other humans through their cultural and biological superiority. But by constructing a testable hypothetical scenario, they left the door open for the discovery of contradictory evidence. To the horror of politically correct academics, by their own definition of modernity, contradictory evidence indicates that Europeans were the first to reach this mental milestone, and that by comparison populations in sub-Saharan Africa and Australia did not catch up, even into modern times.

Over the past few years, the concept of behavioral modernity has become rather unfashionable within the inner-circle of prehistorian scholars. It is probably no coincidence that this concept lost steam after the political implications of behavioral modernity arising in Europe first were realized. Recently, an academic symposium was held to deconstruct the notion that behavioral modernity arose first in one place, or that it can be recognized archaeologically at all (“Alternative Pathways to Complexity: Evolutionary Trajectories in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age,” Current Anthropology, 54, No. S8, Dec. 2013). A new framework was developed which essentially claims that after we evolved as a species, behavioral changes were circumstantial, and that different groups were simply reacting to diverse environmental, demographic, and cultural influences.

Frankly, the concept of behavioral modernity was always dubious, and arguably only ever gained popularity as a political tool for the “we’re all the same under the hood” crowd. It was claimed that behavioral modernity was the tipping point when culture took over natural selection and the human brain was locked into its current state. For example, Neanderthals are thought to have used thrusting spears and necessarily relied more heavily on their brute strength than the more gracile modern humans who had developed a spear throwing technology that required less strength and put them in less danger while hunting."

https://www.unz.com/article/anthropologys-obsession-with-african-origins/

i have loved more brown people than you will ever meet you little sheltered snake.

you are wrong about EVERYTHING. ngmi.

gfy anti-white loser.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/M3KFgZCyE3TV