i do not shadow litigate. i hope you rot in hell.
Discussion
see you in a while - ðïļ 
ðâŽïļ policy:
a policy pivot to faa regulations banning use of smart phone and lithium ion battery operation on planes, as well as no wifi - make air travel safe again. no cigarettes to no shoes at tsa have been brokered through simple studies on safety and faa regulation shifting protocol. imagine the data storms from all sides discussing and how many conversations it opens? bounty networks upset by not being able to hunt on planes? huh. mining teams upset about not being able to take down entire flights with signal interference? huh. i would actually be pleased to have wifi-free plane travel - i would actually fly. crosswords aside, real fallout (literally out of the sky) because smart phone users' tepid microwaved fish brains cannot comprehend no radiation for a few hours. well - the same argument was used about smoking cigarettes on airplanes causing cancer to everyone else because of one addict's "rights".
no wifi on planes. make airplanes smart-free zones.
i was chatting with my mother - free&fair_use.
it #realtrump wants a data gig economy and to tamp down lawless third party mercs, faa wifi ban on all domestic airline travel for radar signal safety reasons would generate more data than all the looped gossip rags in a 4 year term combined. it is legitimate, it will be shocking, and it stimulates conversations from tech to health to engineering to policy to politics to economics to family to mental illness to policing....
but you do whatever you want. looks great. lmao.
ððŽ
yes: proof of work. new policy idea. âðŧ
you might have noticed i publish a clear, related stamped version of policy or ideas somewhere publicly before i discuss it publicly. i have always done that- in texts, emails, scholarly papers, social media. then proof of work is established. i am not worried about it. use it.
ð
ðâŽïļ policy:
someone should show this the the bbc and uk again ahead of their "climate of the willingness" or whatever is happening tomorrow. should the conversation lag - you could ask the brit's how their policy on child exploitation and the mindmagic is doing. seems to me the ones defending and slobbering around about their rhetoric are the ones on the incorrect side of the conversation: not the russians.
#elonmusk - i tried to watch it, but you have to unsuspend me first before i can access the content. ð 
ðâŽïļ policy:
putin saying he doesn't want ukraine/telling the eu to take them - lmao. perfect. the eu is so stupid if they walk into that nightmare. but essentially - ukraine being part of the eu bars the uk from legitimate control. which is kinda funny. the eu cannot afford the cost of ukraine, though.
great work.