I treid, i really tried.

But i only made it through half an hour.

This just comes across as someone so captured by the righteousness of their cause that everyone else is wrong. Anyone that deals in absolutes that cannot be questioned isn't a philosopher.

He's realised the doom loop narative hasn't worked and needs to quickly shift the marketing to keep the grift going and the money flowing.

I didn't hear the rest of the interview, but there was no hint of human scale solutions, just more goverment, more centralisation, more corporate capture, more control.

I'd comsider myself an environmentalists if that word hadn't been so corrupted.

You'd get more people on board selling a message of independence and self-reliance if it was done right.

Local energy grids, local producers, maintianing heritage and craft skills based on good stewardship of resources play well to a citizenship that are looking for a civilisational state message. Again i did get past the 30 minutes mark so maybe im being unfair.

I'm 50.

This is the third time 99% of scientists have agreed that the world will burn in 10-15 years time.

This is already TL;DR so I'll not rant any longer, but it was at least an insight into the modern green movement.

And its one bereft of ideas, compassion or any hopeful vision of a future worth living for....