So according to your reasoning, murderers, war criminals, rapists and pedophiles should be treated with the same dignity as honest, good men?
What's next? Who are we to judge whether a murderer or a paedophile is good or bad? I feel like I'm talking to a government agent. Do you work for an organization? Who do you propagandize for?
Defnitly opjective criminal actions like murder, war criminal activities more have to be responded to. I am a humanist and would therefore argue, that the monly moral response is taking away their freedom. Putting them into a prison. Since every other action would need someone else to commit a crime. So it could not end.
And it is well backed with human rights.
And I think every person has to be viewed as innocent until you got proof that they are not.
If you were a humanist you would protect the victims of rape, the victims of genocide, the victims of pedophilia. I close the discussion with you.
