It makes no sense to trade off an unverifiable supply for privacy on the base layer.

It is better to build privacy on a second layer - regulations allowing.

If Bitcoin was private by default on layer one, it’s adoption would be a much bigger hurdle and much less of a given. It’s not very free market, not very libertarian, etc - but it is the world we live in

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Good arguments brother 🫂

I guess it depends on who we want adopting it. If we want regulators, advertisers, auditors, and global financial manipulators interested, sure making an open ledger is a great idea. If we just want to trade privately amongst ourselves I don't see why it needs to be publicly readable.

You verify both Bitcoin and Monero supply in the same fashion - by running a node. Monero is more complex math, but math nonetheless.

But in practice, verifying is exactly the same. Why? Because no bitcoiner is manually tallying all UTXOs every time they audit to make sure it is correct. They just run a node.

Right that's basically the whole point of the concept of code is law which applies to xmr as much as bitcoin.