FUD:

“Knots is only maintained by one dev.”

Answer:

1) The majority of Knots code is the same as Core, core devs are effectively contributing to knots also. There isn't much of a difference for the essential cryptography functions, same implementation and security as Bitcoin Core.

2) Game Theory - there's no shortage of Luke/Ocean/Knots haters. If there is a problem with it, why hasn't it been exploited yet? You know there are people financially incentivized to take it down.

Suppose there is some ciritical vulnerability in Knots that slipped by the review process. Why wouldn't it already be exploited?

Knots is a high-value piece of software to exploit, surely there are people that would be motivated for political, social, or economic reasons to hack Knots. Knots comprises 13.5% of the bitcoin network, and is relied upon by miners and institutions with high value holdings.

If this theoretical vulnerability exists, why hasn't it been exploited yet? Occam's Razor suggests that no such vulnerability exists.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Coretards are coping hard these days. They would rather filter knots nodes than spam.

👀

That was why I initially didn't run knots.

The longer this saga continues, the more compelling knots is becoming.

while i agree with the general sentiment of your post, it is dangerous to say, just because you haven't seen an exploit, it means there is no security flaw. Depends heavily on what a possible exploit would be. Possible information disclosure wouldnt be noticed quickly unless someone points it out.

This is valid, what can we do to improve review of Knots?