nostr:npub1maaa08ty0cveja5vyk59s0276wzxu42r3np862x9z636wf3sv5gsk29k6p
This seems like a lot of work. Two questions.
1) Why do you think electronics manufacturers would be so unwilling to make useful life claims they can back?
2) Even if some companies did go to the trouble of playing shell company games, to avoid backing their useful life claims, wouldn't that give a free competitive advantage to the ethical hardware companies who wouldn't? I'm thinking of FrameWork, ThinkPenguin, System76, Vikings, FairPhone, Purism, Pine64 etc.
nostr:npub1maaa08ty0cveja5vyk59s0276wzxu42r3np862x9z636wf3sv5gsk29k6p
Bonus question; do you think builders were winding up their companies and starting new ones specifically to avoid standing behind their work? Or was that just a side effect of the dysfunctional structure of the NZ construction industry driving huge numbers of building companies to the wall, and not just small ones (think Mainzeal).
No replies yet.
