The part of objectionable is making any changes based on a non existent threat… that’s my issue. Everyone keeps repeating “we don’t know if quantum computers are feasible”

But, the open source boys working on parallel compute seem to and so do the astrophysicists

Only in bitcoin are we terrified of this threat… so who is funding this narrative? That is my question because you’re welcome to say what you want but why would I engage in discourse when the papers are bullshit?

Theoretical physics cannot be disproven …. You’re asking me to engage in a task where I eat my own tail

While bringing into question battle tested ECC that has no ties to the NSA (secp256k1) and no disclosed backdoors or vulns to date in its curve…

That’s what you’re telling me to do. It you don’t even know that much… you don’t even understand what you’re asking of me