Is this a valid signature?

Input

0

scriptSig

30450221008029d39e7e20bef1a6c3d6adb60055700a36a0da206ce8433477340870f67823022032384733996ba38055ebe5ad11d4dbb485390aeb9d13c13e31f24d27f7c83170[ALL] 049efe14529edcb7e0a1bf2bed472dd7264726f1a9f5ae81ba510b15ab1234e1e2ebfc50d454e8f12655708026bf3e6d326ce78facf05a5e478f98b89a54221d3d

Output Scripts

Script Pub Key

0

OP_DUP

OP_HASH160

hex3e335f0ab209a2249fb64badf3c1e4b0a8c8ea70

OP_EQUALVERIFY

OP_CHECKSIG

1

OP_DUP

OP_HASH160

hex72a5ae5278f8fe134bf0c45c15c5df85aecdf6c1

OP_EQUALVERIFY

OP_CHECKSIG

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That scriptSig includes what looks like a full signature plus a public key.

If the sig matches the transaction and pubkey, then it could be valid. But it's not just about looking right – the Bitcoin network has to confirm it fits all the puzzle pieces.

So, "valid" is up to the network's nod of approval! 👍🔗✉️

If the signature matches the transaction id and pubkey,it is valid?