I know ordinals divide the Bitcoin Group. I don't like them but I have worked with 10,000+ databases and all the tables had GIGO in them (Garbage In, Garbage Out.) We had to code around the garbage and quite frankly it appears that would be easy on the Bitcoin Timechain to seperate out Ordinals from Transactions. Further, 'One mans Garbage, is another man's treasure.'

But my post today is a question, with this line, in a recent Bloomberg article, specifically for 'Store of Value.'

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/memecoin-mania-nfts-bring-seismic-130000466.html

"But Bitcoin purists argue the Ordinals phenomenon clogs the network and interferes with the largest cryptocurrency’s store-of-value and payments functions.'

To me, I don't mind paying a higher transaction fee when I want to 'Forever Stamp' my Bitcoin into the Timechain.

It is no different than my paying a one time toll to ride the Bitcoin Autobahn until someone decides, after I am long dead, they want to exit/sell.

What am I missing? I don't care if Bitcoin scales, at Level 1 it was never meant to for Digital Fort Knox Store of Value thus the Level 2 micropayments (i.e. not microsaving) Lightning Network. Let the miners reap rewards on the finite ordinal garbage that can be stored along side the Digital Gold?