Agree to disagree. That's fine by me, man.

I definitely don't think small of Bitcoin. It's the reason why I no longer have a bank account. Of course, i realize its potential🙄. I also understand how making bitcoin legal tender in a developed (and EXTREMELY powerful) country like the US will impact global adoption. It'll kick it into hyperdrive, imo.

This isn't just about Bitcoin, though. I'm more worried about the geopolitical consequences of this meeting. What's to stop them from starting a new conflict funded by bitcoin? Nothing. There's nothing stopping them from doing so.

Idk. I'm just throwing around ideas. But, we've seen too many times throughout history where people like Bukele and Trump are first praised as heroes then, over time, turn into the same sadistic tyrants that they ousted. So... 🤷

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Let's make something clear. Bitcoin is not money for the "good guys." It is NEUTRAL money! Wars will, most likely, be funded with it in the future, and that's just something we'll have to come to grips with. Bitcoin will not change human nature and will not bring about world peace. It's... just... better... money. #Bitcoin

nostr:nevent1qqs0h8hh3vg80539rsymg8k2ly4v8rk3eycv47vtjpfcvccsrw93vygpz3mhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338g6rsd3e9upzqaw3y9q68yvef3qxy5qlz4wzud8yr2xre7d7l8jd055cy569350zqvzqqqqqqyavtptn

But eliminating the apparatus that makes their respective positions ripe for corruption and completely insulated?

Doesn't make much sense to me.

It's the removal of corrupt positions, that are no longer needed, just so they can implement their own corrupt delegates into newly made ones. This is nothing new.

I understand the concerns

I disagree. Lol