„It’s bitcoin a peer to peer cash .. not BTC, a peer to peer”

You know that in the whitepaper there’s no mention on limited supply, so any units were not even formalized

How I see it you separate speech from written symbol. You can see ₿ and think „sats”, and some gen z sees exactly the same UI and thinks „bitcoins”.

You kinda let people use whatever name they like, while we all see the same, powerful symbol ₿ all around us, then it should organically develop through natural language and social usage and eventually ossify. Sounds counterintuitive but it has happened numerous times in history, also with money eg until 70s or so in the US, it was quite common to write prices in cents in many places, either without any currency symbol eg „50” or afaik also with $ symbol, even when meant for cents. I don’t think people were confused what was cent or dollar was otherwise they wouldn’t use that format

But see how both of those evolutions of how wiring units for both Bitcoin and dollar looked like relate heavily on changes in value. For Bitcoin this whole discussion is because of rapid growth, dollar did the same but over decades and in opposite direction.

I am still using sats mentally, but see using it with ₿ visually feels natural